News

What the rise in winding-up petitions without statutory demands means for debtors

Restructuring and Insolvency
6
November
2025
at

As an insolvency practitioner, I’ve seen a marked shift in how creditors, often led by their solicitors, are choosing to collect debts. Increasingly, we are witnessing winding-up petitions issued without any prior statutory demand or warning to the debtor.

For your clients, company directors, this trend is both alarming and dangerous.

Historically, there was a clear and logical path before an insolvency petition could be filed: a statutory demand would first be served, giving the company 21 days to respond, settle, or raise a dispute. Now, that vital breathing space is often being removed and being replaced by an aggressive and immediate legal action that can shut down a business before it has a chance to respond.

What’s happening?

Some solicitors acting for creditors are now issuing winding-up petitions without first serving a statutory demand. This is legally possible in certain cases, such as where the debt is clearly due and not seriously disputed, but it’s fast becoming routine, even in more complex or questionable debt scenarios.

The result? Companies are being blindsided by petitions that can freeze bank accounts, destroy supplier relationships, and trigger irreversible reputational damage, often over disputes that could have been resolved with dialogue or mediation.

For accountants, this means financial distress can escalate to crisis level before you even become aware of it. By the time the client picks up the phone, their bank accounts may already be frozen, leaving you with very few options to help.

The impact on debtors

This practice has profound consequences for companies - particularly SMEs, startups, and those navigating short-term cashflow problems. Here’s what it often means for the debtor:

  • No Warning, No Time to Act - Without a statutory demand, many directors (and their accountants) only become aware of the issue when they receive the petition, or worse, when their bank accounts are frozen. This removes any real opportunity to engage, dispute, or pay.
  • Immediate Reputational Harm - Winding-up petitions are public. Once advertised, they damage trust with customers, suppliers, and lenders.
  • Operational Disruption - Banks often freeze accounts as soon as they learn of a petition, halting trade and payroll.
  • Costs and Complexity - Defending a winding-up petition is expensive. Legal fees and court costs mount quickly, diverting vital funds from operations.

Directors lose control of the insolvency process

One of the most serious and often overlooked consequences of a winding-up petition is that it takes the insolvency process out of the directors’ hands.

If a winding up order is granted, the court will appoint the Official Receiver as the liquidator. At that point, directors lose all control over how the business is closed, how assets are realised, and how creditors are dealt with.

This also limits their ability to pursue alternative options, such as:

  • Administration, which can preserve business value and allow trading to continue under protection from creditors.
  • Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA), where the business agrees to repay debts over time while avoiding liquidation.
  • Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation (CVL), where directors can take initiative to wind up the company in an orderly and transparent manner, choosing their own licensed insolvency practitioner.

Once a winding-up petition is presented, the option of entering into a CVL is often lost or severely restricted without the creditor agreeing to withdraw the petition or the court’s permission for the CVL to continue.

Once the petition is advertised, other creditors can jump in and support it, leaving directors unable to regain control, even if they wish to take proactive steps to wind down the business properly.

This legal technicality is rarely understood until it’s too late, and by then, directors have been boxed into a reactive, public, and more destructive process.

Early collaboration between accountants and insolvency practitioners allows for planned, controlled processes like CVLs or CVAs, preserving value and client relationships. Late involvement often removes those options entirely.

What should debtors do?

If you’re an accountant advising a client who has received a winding-up petition, especially if it came without warning or a statutory demand, act immediately.

Encourage your client to seek insolvency advice alongside your own. Delay can cause irreversible harm.

Final thoughts

The increasing use of winding-up petitions without statutory demands represents a serious challenge for fair business practice. For debtors, it removes natural safeguards, adds unnecessary cost, and accelerates risk, often over debts that could be settled or genuinely disputed.

For accountants, this development underlines how vital your role is in identifying financial distress early and guiding clients to appropriate advice. Waiting for a petition to land can remove every viable rescue option.

If any of your clients are struggling with mounting HMRC arrears or creditor pressure, don’t wait until a winding-up petition arrives. Get in touch with us early, we can help you support your client, and look to preserve their business.

Share
News
insertpageurl

Feedback Form

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec ultricies consequat.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

News and insights

Read More

HMRC Annual Report 24/25

Funding

15
August
2025
Debt Advisory

Get in touch
with Leonard Curtis

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.